The myth of the “common
man” was invented by the ruling class to appeal to the cause of the deprived or
the poor. To rope in the votes of the deprived people,this convenient and myth was created. The truth is that we Indians never empathised with the ordinary poor man.Ruling class pretends to feel for the predicament of the poor.We did not allow people have any equality in any walks of life and always kept the poor man suppressed. Why was there no equality in India? Because there was always an
upper class which wanted to retain its position of direct access to resources
and deprive the ordinary people of important resources. In the past, there was
a systematic suppression of the less privileged. Today, established aristocracy
does does not want to let its power out of its grip. Name sake reforms,
propagation of false claims of progress, and inculcation of ideology are ways
by which the established class of upper strata of hierarchy maintains itself. But
the truth is that power of the people will assert itself even when the upper
class aristocracy defines its identity as “the superior people” with its privileged
status. Changes will come violently in form of protests. Conservative mindsets
have to be changed and new ideas have to be introduced for the established upper
classes cannot maintain their statuses permanently. With its strong influence,
upper class dominates in the maintenance of the power system—and that is to pay
big money to elected persons and other persons in power. When this lucrative nexus
of the conservative aristocracy and ruling elite is threatened, they resort to
other methods of holding on to their power, for they know how to hold on to
their status. There are definite limits to the equalising role of democracy. However
we may try, the dominant behaviour of man will manifest itself in some or other
form.The myth of the "common man" was their cunning invention to pretend to sympathise with the poor.The myth of the "common man" will work for a while and soon people will know how they are being fooled. We have to constantly to counter check the
accumulation of power in hands of the more privileged.Otherwise existence of governments
themselves will be threatened; protests may overthrow them
Inequality suppresses the free mind. There should there be a free mind and no constraints imposed on the mind, so that we can think about innovations. Indian mindsets will have to change so that they can think. Change can bring out intelligent and talented individuals amongst our population who can contribute to growth of the society, nation and humanity. Why is it that we Indians did not invent anything like the telephone, car, TV, air plane, Internet, or the mobile. We have had always a very large population but had no geniuses; we had forever suppressed many people by allocating lower statuses by not allowing access to resources. We had always kept our people’s mind in bondage of caste, class and creed and denied big mass of our population any opportunities to think. People who are in the low status cannot innovate as their thoughts are in day to day exigencies in which they have to survive.Poverty or “denied access to resources” does not allow the full development of the individual. That is why there were no geniuses, no inventors and there was no renaissance. Our older civilisation made sure that we were a docile people; we were vulnerable to foreign invaders (British).And we were prone to become a slave society which British made out of us. Even now, we are a docile timid people and live in a humble manner. This is the mindsets of the masses.And that is why they easily believe in the ruling elites' promises to the non existent "common man". In India we have the super rich and the super poor and there is no 'common man'.
Inequality suppresses the free mind. There should there be a free mind and no constraints imposed on the mind, so that we can think about innovations. Indian mindsets will have to change so that they can think. Change can bring out intelligent and talented individuals amongst our population who can contribute to growth of the society, nation and humanity. Why is it that we Indians did not invent anything like the telephone, car, TV, air plane, Internet, or the mobile. We have had always a very large population but had no geniuses; we had forever suppressed many people by allocating lower statuses by not allowing access to resources. We had always kept our people’s mind in bondage of caste, class and creed and denied big mass of our population any opportunities to think. People who are in the low status cannot innovate as their thoughts are in day to day exigencies in which they have to survive.Poverty or “denied access to resources” does not allow the full development of the individual. That is why there were no geniuses, no inventors and there was no renaissance. Our older civilisation made sure that we were a docile people; we were vulnerable to foreign invaders (British).And we were prone to become a slave society which British made out of us. Even now, we are a docile timid people and live in a humble manner. This is the mindsets of the masses.And that is why they easily believe in the ruling elites' promises to the non existent "common man". In India we have the super rich and the super poor and there is no 'common man'.
No comments:
Post a Comment