We have not thought about how the farmer will benefit. He will be forced to produce more and in keeping up with the rising expectations. He does not have the technology to keep up as industrial mode of production is not here yet. If foreign investment goes into modernising the mode of production, while keeping the farmer’s role as the chief stake holder, we may become successful both ways. But all attention is on the questions of: big retail giants or small time shops? Who wants to profit from the labour of the farmer?who doesn't?The labour of the farmer is a resource which all want to grab for their own selfish benefit(profit).
Let us look at the people of India with empathy and try to understand the conditions there
Tuesday, 29 November 2011
Farmer's labour: who wants to use it for making profits
We have not thought about how the farmer will benefit. He will be forced to produce more and in keeping up with the rising expectations. He does not have the technology to keep up as industrial mode of production is not here yet. If foreign investment goes into modernising the mode of production, while keeping the farmer’s role as the chief stake holder, we may become successful both ways. But all attention is on the questions of: big retail giants or small time shops? Who wants to profit from the labour of the farmer?who doesn't?The labour of the farmer is a resource which all want to grab for their own selfish benefit(profit).
Friday, 25 November 2011
Pre-industrial farmer in modern post-industrial Era
Monday, 21 November 2011
Importance of agrarian cooperatives
In today's ultra modern net market, the farmer is caught with old world technology. Alienated in remote areas, the simple people are not aware of today's industrial farming and are totally isolated.We must rescue them and bring them up to the standards of today's world.
Cooperatives are needed for others also.Not just farmers, but artisans, crafts men, and weavers and so many are living in inaccessible places, and have not come into to the modern world's fold. They can use their creativity in manufacturing products because the era of simple artisans has ended.They should truly inherit the land and also participate in the making of modern India. They are the real Indians--those who have been practising a simple way of life of work and worship, those who symbolically share the harvests of the land, those who are one with the culture and religion of the land.We must help these people to survive and prosper.
Friday, 18 November 2011
Myth of "Common Man"--A Cunning Invention
The myth of the “common
man” was invented by the ruling class to appeal to the cause of the deprived or
the poor. To rope in the votes of the deprived people,this convenient and myth was created. The truth is that we Indians never empathised with the ordinary poor man.Ruling class pretends to feel for the predicament of the poor.We did not allow people have any equality in any walks of life and always kept the poor man suppressed. Why was there no equality in India? Because there was always an
upper class which wanted to retain its position of direct access to resources
and deprive the ordinary people of important resources. In the past, there was
a systematic suppression of the less privileged. Today, established aristocracy
does does not want to let its power out of its grip. Name sake reforms,
propagation of false claims of progress, and inculcation of ideology are ways
by which the established class of upper strata of hierarchy maintains itself. But
the truth is that power of the people will assert itself even when the upper
class aristocracy defines its identity as “the superior people” with its privileged
status. Changes will come violently in form of protests. Conservative mindsets
have to be changed and new ideas have to be introduced for the established upper
classes cannot maintain their statuses permanently. With its strong influence,
upper class dominates in the maintenance of the power system—and that is to pay
big money to elected persons and other persons in power. When this lucrative nexus
of the conservative aristocracy and ruling elite is threatened, they resort to
other methods of holding on to their power, for they know how to hold on to
their status. There are definite limits to the equalising role of democracy. However
we may try, the dominant behaviour of man will manifest itself in some or other
form.The myth of the "common man" was their cunning invention to pretend to sympathise with the poor.The myth of the "common man" will work for a while and soon people will know how they are being fooled. We have to constantly to counter check the
accumulation of power in hands of the more privileged.Otherwise existence of governments
themselves will be threatened; protests may overthrow them
Inequality suppresses the free mind. There should there be a free mind and no constraints imposed on the mind, so that we can think about innovations. Indian mindsets will have to change so that they can think. Change can bring out intelligent and talented individuals amongst our population who can contribute to growth of the society, nation and humanity. Why is it that we Indians did not invent anything like the telephone, car, TV, air plane, Internet, or the mobile. We have had always a very large population but had no geniuses; we had forever suppressed many people by allocating lower statuses by not allowing access to resources. We had always kept our people’s mind in bondage of caste, class and creed and denied big mass of our population any opportunities to think. People who are in the low status cannot innovate as their thoughts are in day to day exigencies in which they have to survive.Poverty or “denied access to resources” does not allow the full development of the individual. That is why there were no geniuses, no inventors and there was no renaissance. Our older civilisation made sure that we were a docile people; we were vulnerable to foreign invaders (British).And we were prone to become a slave society which British made out of us. Even now, we are a docile timid people and live in a humble manner. This is the mindsets of the masses.And that is why they easily believe in the ruling elites' promises to the non existent "common man". In India we have the super rich and the super poor and there is no 'common man'.
Inequality suppresses the free mind. There should there be a free mind and no constraints imposed on the mind, so that we can think about innovations. Indian mindsets will have to change so that they can think. Change can bring out intelligent and talented individuals amongst our population who can contribute to growth of the society, nation and humanity. Why is it that we Indians did not invent anything like the telephone, car, TV, air plane, Internet, or the mobile. We have had always a very large population but had no geniuses; we had forever suppressed many people by allocating lower statuses by not allowing access to resources. We had always kept our people’s mind in bondage of caste, class and creed and denied big mass of our population any opportunities to think. People who are in the low status cannot innovate as their thoughts are in day to day exigencies in which they have to survive.Poverty or “denied access to resources” does not allow the full development of the individual. That is why there were no geniuses, no inventors and there was no renaissance. Our older civilisation made sure that we were a docile people; we were vulnerable to foreign invaders (British).And we were prone to become a slave society which British made out of us. Even now, we are a docile timid people and live in a humble manner. This is the mindsets of the masses.And that is why they easily believe in the ruling elites' promises to the non existent "common man". In India we have the super rich and the super poor and there is no 'common man'.
Wednesday, 16 November 2011
Winning Trust of people is a truly successful state
The state of Assam has won the trust of its people.The government in Assam is constantly modifying and changing meet more new exigencies. The concept of people's government--"Raijor Podulit Rajior Sarkar" has worked out very well here.The elected leaders make sure that the welfare schemes reach the ordinary people.Grievance redressal cells has been made in every government's department and lapses dealt with immediately.Surprise checks are made by leaders visiting government departments to make sure that there is transparency at all levels.The militant groups which had been active for decades are now having talks with the government and resolving all issues. And their problems are heard and solutions are arrived at. People are pacified when their needs are heard.There are fewer crimes and fewer missing people. People can trust police instead of being pushed around by them.Generally all are willing to vote for a government which would reduce crimes like riot, theft and kidnapping but people are not really concerned with overall petty crimes. People also vote for those leaders who can increase the wealth of their state, and be able to make infrastructures like roads.The ordinary people cannot envision larger infrastructural progress but can see only the day to day needs like power and water. Electricity for all households, proper roads and drinking water are the bare necessities that people expect from their government.That can be delivered easily.When conditions are right, people make a way of living for themselves.Assam's good climate has ensured prosperity to tea estates here.And establishment of good schools has brought out a whole new generation of young people who want to work for the betterment of their state. Many who had studied outside the state also return to make positive changes here in their home state.The new generations love their state and have great empathy for their people.And most noteworthy of all is the fact that they are egalitarian in their outlook.It is this spirit and pride in their state and devoted commitment to their people that has brought success for Assam--the evergreen state of India.May it always be green.It is an ideal state and it would progress further in future India for it has the best and dedicated governance.
Tuesday, 15 November 2011
Fuel economic growth and development
Government awakened when its future was at stake- questioning of the rise of cost of petrol.When the issue of increasing price of fuel was questioned repeatedly, new ways to deal with the crisis were explored.When there was small reduction of fuel prices in the world market, government passed on the new low price to the the people. We are now relieved.The three oil companies will meet to make guidelines for reduction process under government's supervision. Government is the chief stake holder in these companies.The government 's oil ministry was noting the exchange rate of the Indian Rupee and bulk rates of crude oil.Brent North sea crude reduced 61 cents to a 113 Dollar barrel,reduced price 23 Cents in a 97 Dollar barrel and Singapore market dropped to 115 Dollar barrel from 125 Dollar a barrel. This made us realise that our oil companies are making big profits while pretending that there is an international price rise of crude oil. Activities of oil companies have to be constantly checked to see if they are doing correct changes.We have to depoliticise the oil companies and government has to be counter-checked also.Only uniform mindset is the "pretending or show of concern for the common man" for only then votes can be obtained.
Who will pay for the lapses? Always,its the people who pay for mismanagement of the government.Any change in the economy of the world, and the poor class in India are the worst affected.Fuel makes a major part of our incomes(12%); next to expenditure on food.We cannot cut down the cost of transport as we have to travel for work.Although only 1% of India owns cars, one percent of a big population like ours is a big number. And 5% depend on two wheelers which need fuel too.
Cost of fuel must be monitored and monopolies must be checked. If economy has to grow and industrialization has to take place basic needs should be fulfilled and fuel has become our basic need.International fuel prices were very low six months ago but we have no facility to store it. Private oil companies dealings have to be tracked. Raising fuel prices and decontrol of market prices and fooling the public will not be tolerated by the educated public. The politics of petrol price rise would be the cost of progress, making of the infrastructural projects would be delayed and the ordinary people will become more impoverished.This would be the result of faulty fuel policy.
Thursday, 10 November 2011
Birth of a Great Saint is celebrated
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
