There are some successes; for example, the rural
employment guarantee scheme (MGREGA) has had the effect of arresting the rural
to urban migration. People would prefer to get some way of getting an income
near their home than risk travelling to a city where they may or may not find
work.
But food schemes are not reaching the people. It is
difficult to identify the poor for whom free food grains could be provided for.
We are now trying to provide identity to an individual by giving them identity
cards based on bio-metrics (fingerprinting or iris imaging) Universal “Public
Distribution Scheme” may work out better than the long process of identifying
and reaching the “poor”.
Hundred years ago people of working age (15–60) were
healthier than people now, as the quality for food grains was better then. Now
the people working ages of (15-30) need more food to work for eight hours a day
in rural lands, as quality of food grains has now reduced. Since work is now distributed
to younger age group, it has meant that the older weaker people(who are not able to work) have become “the unemployed” group and therefore require help from welfare
schemes. In other words, more persons are unemployed than ever before. Thus we are more “poor”
now than hundred years ago.
Community kitchens (where all persons would eat together) will not work in India for cultural reasons. For us, home means a hearth where all
of a family would dine together. We cannot keep our identity of our home in a
public dining area. Only when we are reduced to the condition of a refugee,
such sharing of dining space could be done. For a day or two, we can dine with
all, but it would not be a long term solution.
With the need for food, comes the conventional
necessity of housing or need of a home. So the train of needs continues to grow. These
are needs of the present, to be addressed by future India.
No comments:
Post a Comment