These guidelines are just a reaction or response to the outrage. What is needed is more clear definition of what is exactly "offencive" Each of the words mentioned above must be explained more deeply; they must be described better.Each kind of offence should be differentiated. We must make provision so that police cannot register a case easily without a proper court order; because anything can be interpreted as an offence. Law is left up to interpretation of vague terms which are undefined. If punishment has to be given, it should be reduced to a fine only(not imprisonment).
Is it possible to police the vast Internet?Should the Internet be policed in a democracy like ours? We have the freedom to publish in the newspaper, so we must have the freedom on cyber space too. Are police trying to control people's freedom of expression. Are we becoming a police state?
Now the Supreme Court is going to merely educate the police officers. But is that enough? The law must be changed, so that vague terms are not used.Civil liberties are being reduced by misleading words in this section of the Constitution.